Comparison
Looking for a Disbug alternative? Here is the honest version.
- Disbug
- Per user, tiered
- UserWants
- One plan, no per-seat charge
What they are
Disbug in one sentence
Straight answer
Where each one wins
Pick Disbug for
Video capture with narration
Disbug records the screen while the reporter talks. A still screenshot carries far less.
Console, network and event logs together
All three in one payload. UserWants collects errors and user actions but never network traffic.
Issue tracker integrations
Jira, Asana, Trello and ClickUp out of the box, where UserWants has none.
Pick UserWants for
Customers can actually use it
An extension is a barrier your users will not cross. The widget is already on the page when the bug happens.
Buffered from page load
The last 50 actions and up to 10 errors are captured before anyone decides to report, so intermittent bugs are not lost to a missed recording.
Reports your agent can work
MCP hands Claude Code or Cursor the whole report and lets it move the status when the fix ships.
Side by side
Feature comparison
| Feature | UserWants | Disbug |
|---|---|---|
| Reporter installs something | No | Chrome extension |
| Video capture | No | Yes |
| Network logs | No | Yes |
| JavaScript errors + stack traces | Up to 10, automatic | Yes |
| Steps before the report | Last 50, from page load | From recording start |
| Integrations | None | Jira, Asana, Trello, ClickUp |
| MCP for coding agents | Yes, OAuth, 3 tools | No |
| Feature requests | Same inbox | No |
| Reporter needs an account | No | Usually |
| Pricing | Flat | Per user |
Verdict
Which one to pick
Disbug is aimed at internal QA, and for that it is the stronger tool — video plus network logs plus a Jira ticket at the end is a complete testing loop. UserWants aims at the other end: reports from customers who will never install a Chrome extension, where the job is to collect the evidence automatically because nobody is going to collect it on purpose.
UserWants is for
Bug reports arriving from customers, unprompted
Disbug is for
Internal QA teams recording reproductions into Jira
FAQ
Before you switch
- Is there a Disbug alternative for non-technical users?
- UserWants is built for exactly that case. There is no extension, no account and no recording step — the person clicks a button already on your page, types a sentence, and the browser details, JavaScript errors and their last 50 actions are attached automatically.
- Does it push to Jira like Disbug does?
- No. UserWants has no third-party integrations at all. Reports stay in its own inbox and reach your editor over MCP instead, which suits teams working from Claude Code or Cursor and does not suit teams whose process runs on Jira tickets.
- What about network request logs?
- Not collected, and that is deliberate rather than missing. Request and response bodies are where credentials and personal data end up, so UserWants captures uncaught JavaScript errors with stack frames but leaves network traffic alone entirely.
Try it beside Disbug.
Paste the tag on the same site and run both for a sprint. The reports arrive in parallel and nothing about your current setup changes.